Thursday, March 3, 2011

Asus ships cardboard PC cases with motherboards


When you order components to build a new computer you don't really give a lot of thought to the box that they come in. You throw it out and keep what is inside. Then, ironically, you go out and get another box, your case, to put all of the components back into. Well, what if you could skip all of those steps and just re-use the shipping box as a case?
Asus is betting that at least some of their customers will want to re-use their boxes as cases for self-assembled machines. The next time you happen to buy an Asus motherboard, check out the box because it will be able to double as a cardboard case. That's right, the box is a Transformer!
Before you start laughing at the idea of a cardboard case, consider the jobs of a case: keep your pieces in the right places to provide proper ventilation and keep dust off of your components. There is really no reason why properly thick pieces of cardboard cannot fit the bill, and save you some bills at the same time.
Admittedly, it won't look as shiny as a metal case, but you can brag on having a very green machine. After all, you didn't even throw out the box it came in. Not to mention that since it is cardboard nothing is really stopping you from jazzing it up a bit with a set of sharpie markers or your favorite decals.
Admittedly this may not be the best option for heavy use machines that are going to run hot for extended periods of time, like gaming machines, but for most household use it could be a good alternative.
The Mini-ITX boards, which will be the first to ship with the cardboard cases, are expected to go out sometime in June of this year.

74% Of SMBs To Increase Cloud Software Spend

More than half of smaller firms plan to boost their 2011 budgets for collaboration software, according to Egnyte.

Nearly three in four (74%) small and midsize businesses (SMBs) will increase their spending on cloud-based software in 2011, according to a recent survey conducted by Egnyte.
Over half -- 51% -- of SMBs, meanwhile, will bump up their budgets for collaboration software this year. Egnyte, which sells storage, backup, file sharing, and other Web-based services, polled 125 of its resellers on the 2011 spending plans of their SMB customers. The survey was conducted online earlier this year by Zoomerang.

Those rather rosy outlooks for the year ahead could turn even brighter: 44% of respondents to the collaboration software spending question said "I don't know," while just 6% answered a definitive "No." (Egnyte rounded up the final percentage breakdowns in its report, which results in a total of 101% for the collaboration question.)

Discover how cloud platform services are raising the stakes when it comes to what you can expect from embracing the cloud as part of your architecture.
Time To Revisit Your Cloud Strategy

Likewise, only 2% of respondents said no when asked about spending increases on cloud-based software overall. Although it goes by many names -- Web-based, online, software as a service (SaaS) -- cloud, in this case, refers to software hosted off-site and online.

The survey's results come on the heels of Parallels' recent $8.6 billion valuation of today's overall SMB cloud market. That study, which included all hosted IT functions, projected an additional $13 billion of future growth for the SMB market. Other reports released earlier this year have signaled increased IT spending overall in the SMB sector.

The apparent loosening of the IT purse-strings at smaller companies could be the result of repeatedly delaying tech refreshes during the recent recession. Analysys Mason analyst Steve Hilton made note of that broader trend in a recent interview, saying: "The global economy is turned around, so in the developed markets of the world, small businesses are starting to see their businesses grow again." As a result, it would appear SMBs -- though always focused on costs and realizing quantifiable returns on their technology investments -- are ready to update.

A rather specific -- and just a bit leading -- question in Egnyte's survey asked: "What portion of your customers (SMBs) who operate virtual businesses or have remote workers and offices could benefit from cloud storage services?" A full 38% said "all of them." The poll also asked if hybrid cloud storage services are viable replacements for file servers at SMBs; 79% answered yes.

While the news would appear good for cloud providers that target smaller businesses, those that sell their products through third-party partners may need to temper their excitement somewhat. When asked if cloud computing vendors "adequately address the needs of resellers" today, 68% said no.

PHP user group lauds Microsoft's open source contributions

PHP user group lauds Microsoft's open source contributions
Microsoft has often come up short in its attempts to thaw out relations with open source communities, but the company seems to have found success with PHP developers.
"I remember the good old days where open source was the hippie kind of people, and Microsoft [was] the business/enterprise people, and it was like water and fire. You could not put those people together in one room or it would be some kind of a war," says Michelangelo van Dam, co-founder and president of the PHP user group PHPBenelux in Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg.
A few years ago, Microsoft approached van Dam and colleagues, saying the company wanted to ensure that PHP could install natively on Windows. Since then, Microsoft has continued discussions with the PHP community and has built automation tools into Windows Server, making it easier to install PHP on Windows than on Linux, according to van Dam.
Microsoft says it started reaching out to PHP community members in 2006 because programmers were choosing to deploy PHP applications on Unix or Linux rather than Windows. Since 2009 Microsoft has offered the Web Platform Installer tool to install PHP on Windows.
"We started talking, and we got to see that Microsoft is actually opening up to our world of PHP," van Dam says. "And they're doing a great job at it. We met with Microsoft here in Belgium in 2008 and have been working closely together with them to see how we can incorporate their products, their services, into our worlds and help them by giving them feedback from our community."
Van Dam met recently with Gianugo Rabellino, Microsoft's new director of open source communities, and says the hire should help Redmond improve its reputation a bit among free software circles. "He is the right person to sit on that chair for Microsoft," van Dam says (see "Open source expert takes on the hardest job at Microsoft"). Rabellino says his main focus right now "is to enable PHP to shine on our platforms," including Windows Azure.
The PHP scripting language has been around since 1995 and is distributed as free software under the PHP license.
The PHP license is approved by the Open Source Initiative, but it is incompatible with the GNU GPL. The reason, as explained at GNU.org, is that "it includes strong restrictions on the use of 'PHP' in the name of derived products." Microsoft's own open source licenses, the Microsoft Public License and Microsoft Reciprocal License, are also incompatible with the GPL. But this is not uncommon. The Mozilla Public License, for example, lacks GPL compatibility.
Microsoft still has a ways to go in convincing larger portions of the open source community that it means no harm, according to van Dam. Microsoft still has an uneasy relationship with Linux, of course, and van Dam says there is still reluctance among open source advocates to partner with Microsoft.
"It has to wear off over time," he says. "It is something you cannot change by flipping a switch. It will require a couple more years."
But van Dam says his community of PHP developers has, in general, welcomed Microsoft's contributions. The user group even held a contest in which PHP developers were invited to create applications for Windows.
"The PHP community welcomes everyone," he says. "We don't care who you are, what your background is. In that perspective, we made the people from Microsoft feel right at home. They came to listen to us. They wanted to know why we haven't developed applications for the Windows platform. And they really listened and said, 'Hey, we need to do something about this.'"
Van Dam adds, "It's truly amazing to see that Microsoft now has learned the value of open source, knowing that open source is here to stay. Instead of fighting it with all their power and marketing, they actually embrace it, and I think that's a very good thing."

The new Apple iPad 2 and how it compares to Motorola Xoom and the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1

The latest version of Apple’s tablet, the iPad has been officially released. The arrival of the iPad 2 puts to rest the “what to expect” machinery on the Internet! The new device was unveiled by Apple’s CEO Steve Jobs, who briefly returned from his extended medical leave. The excitement within Apple Inc. was quite visible as well. Dressed in his trademark blue jeans and black turtleneck sweater, Mr. Jobs joked to the audience at the San Francisco launch, "I just didn't want to miss today."

The iPad 2 is both thinner and lighter than the predecessor- 33% thinner and 15% lighter. The iPad 2 is powered by the 1GHz dual core A5 processor, which brings it on par with the rivals in terms of power- the Motorola Xoom and the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1. The front camera allows Apple to make the iPad 2 FaceTime capable, while the rear camera is capable of recording 720p HD videos, much like the iPhone4. There is no clarity on how much RAM the iPad 2 has, but it is expected that it exactly double of the 256 MB which the predecessor had. Apple also said that the new iPad will have 9 times more powerful graphics. The battery life remains same, at least as far as what Apple promises- 10 hours. The device will ship with the latest version of the iOS4.3, which will be available for the iPhone4, iPhone 3GS and the iPod on 11th March 2011. The HDMI out feature has been introduced as well, allowing users to connect the iPad to the TV and either mirror the iPad display or enjoy multimedia content on the bigger screen. However, users will need to buy the HDMI cable which costs about US$ 30. Also, the iPad 2 will be available in white and black colour options.

What the iPad 2 misses out on is the widely anticipated Retina Display. The 9.7 inch display from the original iPad has been carried forward, with the 1024x768 resolution. This is where the two rivals take a lead, at least on the spec sheet.

How the iPad 2 shapes up against the rivals
With the Android 3.0 powered Motorola Xoom and the upcoming Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1. This table will help you in comparing the specs.

Apple iPad 2Motorola XoomSamsung Galaxy Tab 10.1


PlatformiOS 4.3Android 3.0Android 3.0

Display9.7-inch10.1-inch10.1-inch

Resolution1024 x 7681280 x 8001280 x 800

Processor1GHz dual-core Apple A51GHz dual-core NVIDIA Tegra 21GHz dual- core

Memory512 MB RAM1GB RAMN.A.

Storage16GB / 32GB / 64GB32GB16GB / 32GB

Front cameraVGA2 megapixel2 megapixel

Rear camera5 megapixel (720p HD video)5 megapixel (720p HD video)8 megapixel (720p HD video)

WiFi802.11a/b/g/n802.11a/b/g/n802.11a/b/g/n

Bluetooth2.1 + EDR2.1 + EDRNA

Battery6600 mAh6,500 mAh6860 mAh

Weight1.33 pounds (Wi-Fi version)1.6 pounds1.3 pounds

PriceUS$ 499 onwardsUS$ 600 onwardsN.A.


Comparing the iPad 2 with the predecessor
Before we sign off, let us just take a quick glance at how the iPad 2 is different from the predecessor.


(Image courtesy: PC Mag)
Apple iPadApple iPad 2
Display9.7-inch9.7-inch
Resolution1024 x 768 1024 x 768

Intel 8-Core Xeon Processors Power SuperServer

Intel 8-Core Xeon Processors Power SuperServer
A newer version of Super Micro Computer's server running Intel's forthcoming 10-core Xeons will be released later this year.

Super Micro SuperServer 5086B-TRF
Super Micro Computer announced the availability of the SuperServer 5086B-TRF Monday at the CeBIT trade show in Hannover, Germany. The system is available with eight 8-core Xeon processors.
Super Micro also announced plans to released a 5U enterprise server capable of running eight of Intel's 10-core Xeon processors. The company said it plans on making the system available with the 10-core processors, codenamed Westmere-EX, shortly after they are available in early April, Douglas Herz, marketing manager for Super Micro, said in an interview.
The new product, unveiled in November at the SuperComputing Conference in New Orleans, stands out from the competition in packing so much in a 5u system, which includes the 8 CPUs, 64 DIMMs, up to 10 PCI 2.0 expansion slots, and 24 hard drives, Herz said. The system is targeted at financial institutions, research groups, oil and gas companies, and other organizations with a need for high-performance computing.
In addition, the system has four power supplies, each capable of generating 1,400 watts of power. The power supplies are paired so one can act as a backup. "If one goes down than the other is ready to take over the power needs of the system," Herz said.
Super Micro did not disclose pricing.
The company also launched at CeBIT a high-density blade server called the SuperBlade SBI-7126TG. Each of the 10-blades in the 7U system supports two Nvidia Tesla M2050/M2070 GPU cards and two Xeon CPUs from either the 5500 or 5600 series. Each node uses a Gen2 PCI-Express x16 connection.
Like the SuperServer 5086B-TRF, the latest SuperBlade system is targeted at organizations in need of high-performance computing systems. The difference is in the availability of the Nvidia GPUs for offloading from the CPU mathematical calculations that are measured in the trillions per second in many research organizations.
Typically, HPC developers will split application workloads between the CPU and GPU, taking advantage of the strengths of each processor. In general, GPUs are better at handling computational tasks. Nvidia has been shipping its Tesla GPUs for HPC applications since 2007.
Pricing for the SuperBlade SBI-7126TG was not disclosed.

iPad 2: 5 Things Apple Left Out

Apple's second-generation iPad mostly impresses, but Apple still managed to leave some key technologies out.

The Apple iPad 2, announced at an event in San Francisco today, mostly bumps up key specs such as the processor, adds cameras, and sheds both weight and bulk. Despite all the nifty improvements, We are slightly disappointed that Apple failed to deliver on a few vital differentiators.
No 4G
The iPad 2 will be sold in three wireless configurations: Wi-Fi, Wi-Fi + 3G (AT&T), and Wi-Fi + 3G (Verizon Wireless). Looking at the spec sheet, it indicates that the AT&T variant of the iPad 2 supports quad-band GSM/EDGE and quad-band UMTS/HSDPA/HSUPA. The Verizon Wireless variant uses EVDO Rev. A. These are 3G technologies. The iPad 2 doesn't have HSPA+, nor does it have LTE.
Also, Apple has completely left Sprint and T-Mobile out of the loop. With no baked-in support for their 3G/4G networks, Apple is keeping the nation's third- and fourth-largest network operators in the iOS dark.
No NFC
Apple failed to add near-field communications (NFC) capabilities to the iPad 2. Granted, the tablet form factor isn't exactly what comes to mind when you think "mobile payments," but it would have been a good precedent to set. Google's Android platform (at least the 2.3 Gingerbread version) supports NFC, though only one phone is properly equipped. Getting the chips into mobile devices of any shape/size will help drive the NFC and mobile payment ecosystem forward. Sadly, not with this generation.
No Accessory Improvements
Apple didn't change a darned things about the iPad's accessory support. Most disappointing? That Apple didn't move (or at least duplicate) the 30-pin connector to the side of the device for better landscape compatibility. The iPad 2 also doesn't have an SD card slot for expandable memory.
The one thing that Apple did announce is a new adapter -- which costs a whopping $39 -- that provides HDMI out to devices such as televisions. It's great that the iPad 2 finally gets HDMI support by way of an adapter, but a dedicated port would have been better.
No Display Improvements
The iPad 2 uses the exact same display as the original iPad. It measures 9.7-inches across the diagonal, and has 1024 x 768 pixels, giving it a disappointing 132 pixels per inch. By way of comparison, the iPhone 4's Retina Display has a pixel density of 326ppi. Perhaps we'll see a better display on next year's model.
No Pixie Dust Or Unicorn Horns
The first iPad was "magical." Apple CEO Steve Jobs crowed on stage today that Apple has sold more than 15 million of them. You could say the iPad was magical for Apple's bottom line, but the iPad 2 doesn't have the same instant, drool-inducing appeal that the original iPad had. It's just a spec bump and not much more. There was no "one more thing" at the press conference today, and Apple didn't deliver any stunning new features or capabilities (though Garage Band and iMove look pretty darned good).
This leaves me wondering just how many of the 15-million-iPad-army will pony up another $500 to $800 for a new iPad. Are the cameras, faster processor, and thinner/lighter design worth the upgrade cost?